<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perilous Performance Proportions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Creating processes isn&#039;t exactly cheap, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the performance win that everything thinks it is (for additional other options too).  Work is under way on this, but it will not make Firefox 4.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating processes isn&#8217;t exactly cheap, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the performance win that everything thinks it is (for additional other options too).  Work is under way on this, but it will not make Firefox 4.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 06:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>Would tabs in separate processes make start up a helluva lot faster? Has there been any movement on this feature that Firefox competitors have had production released for a long time now? Are the Electrolysis (?) people on to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would tabs in separate processes make start up a helluva lot faster? Has there been any movement on this feature that Firefox competitors have had production released for a long time now? Are the Electrolysis (?) people on to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gen Kanai</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen Kanai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most important issues that needs to be mitigated in our next release, so I&#039;m terribly happy you&#039;re on the case.  I too love Bar Tab and wonder how we might integrate the best parts of Bar Tab into a release.  I realize that is a little orthogonal to what you&#039;re trying to fix but Bar Tab significantly changes startup time.  I think we need to fix the underlying issues too of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most important issues that needs to be mitigated in our next release, so I&#8217;m terribly happy you&#8217;re on the case.  I too love Bar Tab and wonder how we might integrate the best parts of Bar Tab into a release.  I realize that is a little orthogonal to what you&#8217;re trying to fix but Bar Tab significantly changes startup time.  I think we need to fix the underlying issues too of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverWave</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4413</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverWave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4413</guid>
		<description>BarTab!

It is very simple but VERY affective. 

Quote:
&quot;So you keep open tabs like libraries keep books... Aren&#039;t you afraid Firefox will consume all your memory? Don&#039;t you fear browser restarts because it takes so long to reload all your tabs?

Well, you shouldn&#039;t! Because now you can put all the tabs you don&#039;t need on your bar tab, and only pay for the load when you actually want to visit them.&quot;

&gt;startup time scales linearly with the number of tabs session restore has to restore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BarTab!</p>
<p>It is very simple but VERY affective. </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;So you keep open tabs like libraries keep books&#8230; Aren&#8217;t you afraid Firefox will consume all your memory? Don&#8217;t you fear browser restarts because it takes so long to reload all your tabs?</p>
<p>Well, you shouldn&#8217;t! Because now you can put all the tabs you don&#8217;t need on your bar tab, and only pay for the load when you actually want to visit them.&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;startup time scales linearly with the number of tabs session restore has to restore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmdesp</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4410</link>
		<dc:creator>jmdesp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4410</guid>
		<description>Loading time with many tabs should be a *top* priority for Mozilla. That&#039;s a major real life problem. I go with bastiaan&#039;s solution : delay loading of tab, only show the title, load them when the user selects them. People with a problem  of large number of tabs actually use them as some kind of alternative to bookmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loading time with many tabs should be a *top* priority for Mozilla. That&#8217;s a major real life problem. I go with bastiaan&#8217;s solution : delay loading of tab, only show the title, load them when the user selects them. People with a problem  of large number of tabs actually use them as some kind of alternative to bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bastiaan</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/410/comment-page-1#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>bastiaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=410#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>It seems to me there&#039;s no way to eliminate disk access delays, although they can probably be reduced somewhat.

I think a better way to solve this problem would be to delay loading the profile tabbing data until the Firefox window, with one empty tab, is available. Then the previous tabs can be loaded in the background while the UI is available to the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me there&#8217;s no way to eliminate disk access delays, although they can probably be reduced somewhat.</p>
<p>I think a better way to solve this problem would be to delay loading the profile tabbing data until the Firefox window, with one empty tab, is available. Then the previous tabs can be loaded in the background while the UI is available to the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

