<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you know we have a style guide?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsan Akhgari</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/comment-page-1#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsan Akhgari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=388#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Making sense of Firefox startup time...&lt;/strong&gt;

One of the things that we at Mozilla would like to do better at is the amount of time it takes between when you launch Firefox, and when it starts up and is usable.&#160; We&#039;ve been tackling this problem for quite a while, and have already made tremen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Making sense of Firefox startup time&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One of the things that we at Mozilla would like to do better at is the amount of time it takes between when you launch Firefox, and when it starts up and is usable.&nbsp; We&#8217;ve been tackling this problem for quite a while, and have already made tremen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wladimir Palant</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/comment-page-1#comment-4264</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Palant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=388#comment-4264</guid>
		<description>Ah, right, there is a style guide. I remember seeing it around the time I started with Mozilla. Then I learned the simple rule &quot;just follow the style of the file your are changing&quot; and forgot about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, right, there is a style guide. I remember seeing it around the time I started with Mozilla. Then I learned the simple rule &#8220;just follow the style of the file your are changing&#8221; and forgot about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/comment-page-1#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=388#comment-4258</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know the reasoning there.  You&#039;d have to ask in &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.platform/topics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mozilla.dev.platform&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t know the reasoning there.  You&#8217;d have to ask in <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.platform/topics" rel="nofollow">mozilla.dev.platform</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan!</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/comment-page-1#comment-4256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 06:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=388#comment-4256</guid>
		<description>From the JavaScript section:
&quot;Use \uXXXX unicode escapes for non-ASCII characters. The character set for XUL, DTD, script, and properties files is UTF-8 which is not easily readable.&quot;

That has me confused. Are you (as in: Mozilla) really claiming hexadecimal references to Unicode code points are more readable than the actual characters they represent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the JavaScript section:<br />
&#8220;Use \uXXXX unicode escapes for non-ASCII characters. The character set for XUL, DTD, script, and properties files is UTF-8 which is not easily readable.&#8221;</p>
<p>That has me confused. Are you (as in: Mozilla) really claiming hexadecimal references to Unicode code points are more readable than the actual characters they represent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/388/comment-page-1#comment-4253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=388#comment-4253</guid>
		<description>When do we get the lint or JSHydra or whatever tool to automatically tell us the errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do we get the lint or JSHydra or whatever tool to automatically tell us the errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

