<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asychronous Storage Statements Just Got Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275/comment-page-1#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=275#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>We had two branches with 3.5 as well.  We had mozilla-1.9.1 and mozilla-central.  For 3.6, we have mozilla-1.9.2, and 3.7 is currently being worked on in mozilla-central.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had two branches with 3.5 as well.  We had mozilla-1.9.1 and mozilla-central.  For 3.6, we have mozilla-1.9.2, and 3.7 is currently being worked on in mozilla-central.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275/comment-page-1#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=275#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>that part already made sense... what I don&#039;t understand is why there are two separate branches for 3.6 and 3.7. They only had one branch like this for the dev of 3.5. Is one going to be 4.0 and one 4.5? Sorry if I&#039;m derailing the topic of your blog post ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that part already made sense&#8230; what I don&#8217;t understand is why there are two separate branches for 3.6 and 3.7. They only had one branch like this for the dev of 3.5. Is one going to be 4.0 and one 4.5? Sorry if I&#8217;m derailing the topic of your blog post ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275/comment-page-1#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=275#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>1.9.2 is the version of Gecko that Firefox 3.6 will be based off of.  1.9.3 is the version of Gecko that Firefox 3.7 will be based off of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.9.2 is the version of Gecko that Firefox 3.6 will be based off of.  1.9.3 is the version of Gecko that Firefox 3.7 will be based off of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/275/comment-page-1#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/?p=275#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>sweet, a faster awesomebar is a good thing to have :)

the thing im confused about is how 1.9.2 is part of fox 3.6, and they have now started a 3.7 branch...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sweet, a faster awesomebar is a good thing to have :)</p>
<p>the thing im confused about is how 1.9.2 is part of fox 3.6, and they have now started a 3.7 branch&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

