Comments on: eTLD Meet mozStorage?

By: Dan Witte

Dan Witte — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:49:35 +0000

thanks fredrik, nice docs!

By: Shawn Wilsher

Shawn Wilsher — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:57:31 +0000

@Asrail

That’s actually a fairly good point. Ideally anywhere that we store URI’s that we need to parse for certain things, we should probably be storing those parts separately.

The reality of the situation though is that there isn’t much of a perf impact regardless (now, if this were a client server model, this would probably be an issue).

By: Asrail

Asrail — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:50:56 +0000

Well… it maybe to late but…

wouldn’t be much faster and easier if subdomain, eTLD and the path were different fields on the table, instead of processing a string?

Well… I don’t know SQLite very well, but this way would be nice we could make URI a type and querying it’s parts just like we do with timestamps.

With different fields or a type, would be much quicker to search for all occurrences of a domain…

By: Shawn Wilsher

Shawn Wilsher — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:21:07 +0000

@fredrik

Thanks for contributing!

By: fredrik

fredrik — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:49:09 +0000

Figured this was as good a time as any to start contributing to DevMo. nsIEffectiveTLDService. It's a start, at least. Now to write some Python that can grok the .idl file and auto-generate a doc stub, 'cause copy/paste is fun for all of 2 seconds.