<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 80% Won&#8217;t Be Fixed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-2469</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130#comment-2469</guid>
		<description>@Fred

Maybe we should change all instances of bug to task :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred</p>
<p>Maybe we should change all instances of bug to task :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnwilsher.com/archives/130#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>Sadly, the word &quot;bug&quot; has long become associated with &quot;software error&quot; even though the Mozilla notion of &quot;bug&quot; is &quot;task&quot;, which covers everything from suggestion over &quot;don&#039;t forget&quot; to an actual error.

There is software out there that uses &quot;task&quot; instead of &quot;bug&quot; to avoid this confusion.

I like the word &quot;bug&quot; but obviously it is prone to misunderstandings, resulting in people like the NYT writer assuming exceptionally bad software quality behind everything that mentions this word. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, the word &#8220;bug&#8221; has long become associated with &#8220;software error&#8221; even though the Mozilla notion of &#8220;bug&#8221; is &#8220;task&#8221;, which covers everything from suggestion over &#8220;don&#8217;t forget&#8221; to an actual error.</p>
<p>There is software out there that uses &#8220;task&#8221; instead of &#8220;bug&#8221; to avoid this confusion.</p>
<p>I like the word &#8220;bug&#8221; but obviously it is prone to misunderstandings, resulting in people like the NYT writer assuming exceptionally bad software quality behind everything that mentions this word. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
